Body Surface Area Calculator

Du Bois and Mosteller body surface area from height and weight.

Health and FitnessUpdated 2026-10-102 min read
Body Surface Area Calculator
BSA (Du Bois)
...
BSA (Mosteller check)...
In square feet...

What it does

Body surface area estimates the skin area from height and weight. Oncology, burn care, and physiology scale some doses and measures to surface rather than weight alone, because heat loss and exposure follow area more closely.

The tool above takes height and weight in metric or imperial. It returns the Du Bois value as the main answer with the Mosteller value beside it for cross checking, plus square feet for reference.

The default example of 70 kg at 175 cm gives 1.85 m² Du Bois against 1.84 m² Mosteller (19.89 ft²). The imperial mirror of 154 lb at 69 in lands at 1.85 and 1.84 m² as well, showing the conversion path holds.

Du Bois and Du Bois published the 1916 height weight formula from direct measurements, and NCI drug dictionaries plus the National Library of Medicine still reference BSA based dosing today. Mosteller offered the simpler root form in 1987 for ward math.

How to use

  1. Pick metric or imperial first.
  2. Enter height without shoes and morning weight.
  3. Read Du Bois first, since most protocols name it.
  4. Compare Mosteller beside it; gaps over a few percent deserve remeasuring.
  5. Hand the pair to the clinician instead of dosing from the page.

Formula

Du Bois: BSA = 0.007184 x weight^0.425 x height^0.725, weight in kg, height in cm. Mosteller: BSA = root(height x weight / 3600).
0.007184
Du Bois constant fitting measured surfaces.
0.425 / 0.725
Powers weighting weight and height.
3600
Mosteller divisor pairing cm with kg.

Imperial inputs convert first (1 in = 2.54 cm, 1 lb = 0.45359237 kg), then run the same metric formulas, so both systems agree. Extreme builds drift because the 1916 sample centered on typical adults.

Worked example

Example: 70 kg at 175 cm

Metric defaults: 175 cm, 70 kg.

  1. Powers: 70^0.425 = 6.078, 175^0.725 = 42.27.
  2. Multiply: 0.007184 x 6.078 x 42.27 = 1.8481.
  3. Round: 1.85 m² Du Bois.
  4. Mosteller: root(175 x 70 / 3600) = root(3.4028) = 1.84 m².
  5. Square feet: 1.8481 x 10.7639 = 19.89 ft². Tool shows 1.85 m², 1.84 m², 19.89 ft².

Reference table

Typical BSA values (Du Bois)
BuildDu BoisContext
60 kg, 165 cmabout 1.66 m²Small adult
70 kg, 175 cm1.85 m²Example here
80 kg, 180 cmabout 2.00 m²Large adult
100 kg, 190 cmabout 2.28 m²Very large adult

Limits

  • Estimate only, never a dosing order by itself.
  • Fitted on typical adults; obesity and infancy drift.
  • Tape and scale error move the answer directly.
  • Protocols name one formula; mixing them across visits breaks trends.

Common mistakes

  • Entering pounds into the kg slot without converting.
  • Using evening weight with shoes for a dosing number.
  • Quoting BSA to three decimals as if skin were machined.
  • Swapping Du Bois and Mosteller mid treatment.
  • Dosing from the page instead of the protocol sheet.

Try it yourself

Quick checks. Answers sit tucked under each question.

Mosteller for 180 cm and 80 kg?

root(180 x 80 / 3600) = root(4) = 2.00 m².

Imperial check: 154 lb at 69 in?

Converts to 69.85 kg and 175.26 cm, giving 1.85 m² Du Bois and 19.9 ft².

Small adult 60 kg at 165 cm?

Du Bois near 1.66 m², Mosteller near 1.66 m².

Questions

What is a normal BSA?

Most adults sit between 1.4 and 2.2 m², with 1.73 m² a classic reference adult.

Du Bois or Mosteller?

Du Bois is the historic standard, Mosteller the simple check. They agree within a few percent typically.

Why dose by surface?

Some drugs and burns scale with exposure and loss, which follow area better than weight.

How precise are inputs?

Half a centimeter and half a kilo are plenty; finer digits outrun tape accuracy.

Does muscle change it?

Only through weight. Two people at 80 kg share the formula even with different builds.

Can I use this for children?

Pediatric protocols use their own tables and checks. Confirm with the care team.

Sources

How this page was checked. The formula above was matched against the cited sources, and the worked example was run through the tool on this page before publishing. If you spot an error, contact us so we can fix it and note the correction.